New Iphigenias 3,000 Years Later…

New Iphigenias 3,000 Years Later… Iphigenia, daughter of Agamemnon, the King and undisputed Leader of the Greek Mycenaean world three thousand years ago, was sacrificed by her King–Father and the other Leaders of the Greeks/Achaeans, in order for the campaign against Troy to commence (the ten-year Trojan War).

The geopolitical–geo-economic stake appears to have been the control of the trade of the Mycenaean States/Kingdoms with the Euxine Pontus (the Black Sea) and the precious “Golden Fleece,” most likely what today corresponds to the Ukrainian–Russian grain. In England, once a thalassocracy and a globally dominant empire, around 1,400 young English girls, some since their childhood, were systematically raped, abused, and blackmailed by gangs of Islamist migrants/guests in the country. The sacrifice of Iphigenia was avenged by her Mother-Queen, Clytemnestra. Deceived by her husband – the King and Commander-in-Chief of the campaign against Troy, Agamemnon – instead of seeing her daughter Iphigenia, as he had misled her to believe, in the bridal bed with the greatest Hero of the Greek World, the god-beloved Achilles, as befitted her age, beauty, and lineage, she gathered her from her grave. Agamemnon was murdered by the hand of her lover and the new King of Mycenae during his absence, Aegisthus! The 1,400 English daughters, however, did not belong to the Royal Family, nor even to the class of nobles or plutocrats… They were children of parents belonging to the working class, living in poor and forgotten working-class neighborhoods, or whose broken families, due to poverty, survived on meager allowances from the dismantled welfare state. Thus, no one cared about avenging their countless sufferings; for decades, no one was interested in their pain or in the delivery of… justice… Iphigenia was sacrificed to serve a state purpose of high strategic importance: the extermination of rival Troy, which, by its very position, controlled the trade route from the Mycenaean-controlled Aegean to the rich and fertile Euxine Pontus (Black Sea), abundant in grain and other commodities—mainly its northern coasts. This was the mythical Golden Fleece, for which their heroic ancestors, the Argonauts, also set forth during the Argonautic Expedition.

The approximately 1,400 English girls who were raped over a period of about 40 years, and whose crimes against them remain “unsolved,” why were they “sacrificed”? The identity of the perpetrators was neither… of royal descent (like Paris, who stole from his brother Agamemnon’s sibling, Menelaus, King of Sparta, his wife, the Fair Helen), nor even of English origin. They were subjects of former English colonies, of the Muslim faith. They did not even participate in the English way of life. What could be more natural than for them to be punished exemplarily? And as for the capabilities of the English police in solving crimes, they are renowned worldwide. However, they came from countries which—either by virtue of their ethnic origin (Arabs) or their religious affiliation (Muslims)—were useful for very critical “modern” geopolitical and geo-economic objectives. In fact, for the most useful and crucial geopolitical operations aimed at maintaining Global Dominance. Firstly, the radical Islamic factor was used in the “trap” set for the main geopolitical rival of that era: the then USSR. The legendary Great Game was “played” between England and Tsarist Russia in Central and Northeastern Asia. It ended with vast, new, sparsely populated countries being incorporated into Russia’s dominion, but with England succeeding in denying and resisting Russia’s advance into the South Asian ring (which encloses “inner” Central Asia, encircling it). Later, these new countries would acquire enormous geo-economic significance due to their natural resources: mainly natural gas and oil.

In a Soviet continuation of the Great Game, which was initially “played” between England and Tsarist Russia in Central and Northeastern Asia, the USSR attacked Afghanistan — of immense strategic importance both for the control of Asia and for access to the South Asian ring. It was an opportunity for the West (USA – England) to set the final, deadly trap for the USSR. At that time, the cooperating “services” of the two countries guided, reinforced, and provided protection, money, and munitions to radical Islamic political groups and isolated extremist Islamic communities, in order to create a relentless and continuous insurgency that constantly drained the forces and resources of the USSR. The significance of the Islamists—under the right political guidance, training, and protection—was fundamental for achieving the West’s greatest geopolitical goal: the collapse of the USSR. But radical Islamism proved to be so effective that it became a constant, underground factor in achieving the most important geopolitical–geo-economic goals of the West. Next target: the continuation of control and the reshaping—according to the needs of the West and Israel—of the Middle East. Once again, a critical geo-economic factor was the control of oil and natural gas. Once again, radical Islamism proved useful/decisive.

The radical Islamic narrative is useful; it creates an extremely effective fanatical environment, necessary for the success of a well-designed objective: the extreme intolerance toward the Other—those who do not belong to the Muslim Ummah (the community of Muslims worldwide) or who do not “properly” follow the Qur’an and the traditions (Hadith)—constitutes the ideal condition for manipulation. And last in the ranking of the “infidels” are the “infidel” women, destined—by the Divine Order of things—for rule-less sexual exploitation by the faithful. Thus, the USSR found its ruthless adversary in Afghanistan, leaving the country to the nightmare of radical Islamists, while at the same time accelerating its own collapse. Later, the destruction of Iraq and the ensuing power vacuum were filled by the so-called “Islamic State.” Then came Syria… Then… The inexperienced, young yet powerful USA had an absolute need for the seasoned Old Albion, with its long history and expertise regarding the Muslim factor and the Muslim communities, factions, and families. The human psychiatric wrecks on the field of “jihad” may prove useful in a future operation… England is useful to the USA because of its capability and experience in the Islamic world. It provides the necessary leverage for negotiating the overall “special relationship” between England and the USA. And every war also has its losses, its victims, and its sacrifices… The Islamic communities within it are breeding grounds of “useful” extremists, whom the English services preferentially “approach,” along with their “useful” mentality, way of life, views, and particularities. The working-class girls, coming mostly from broken families, have (and find) no voice of defense within the English elite. Until, for some, the story of these girls—with the incredible accounts of extreme sexual exploitation over 40 years—becomes useful for serving yet another “great” political purpose: by pretending not to know the reason for the impunity of the perpetrators of Islamic origin—rapists, murderers, blackmailers, etc.—the underage victims are reused for the promotion of the far-right agenda in European societies. The new narrative for the “natives” to consume is that the Left, the woke agenda, the liberal globalist elite, and their “Islamophilia” leave unpunished the rapes of white Christian children by Muslims. Elon Musk and other powerful figures promote this myth. Yet they know very well the truth: the expendability of the young English girls for the service of fundamental geopolitical purposes, whose fulfillment “takes precedence.” Now, these stories can be attributed to the political opponents (with whom, however, the basic geopolitical goals are shared). Machiavelli is still here… Dionysis Pantis is a Supreme Court lawyer and geopolitical analyst. **The opinions published on IBNA are solely those of the authors.